Introduction
Detailed
analysis of Governor Lachlan Macquarie’s punitive actions against the
Aboriginal population of New South Wales in 1816 reveals the true nature and extent of the war
engaged in by local military forces and the British colonial authorities, along with a
corresponding cover-up of those activities and outcomes to both the local
community and authorities in England. This analysis has implications for our
present day reading of Australian history and the ongoing debate over
recognition of the so-called Forgotten War (Australian Aboriginal War),
especially in light of the ANZAC and World War I centennial commemorations of
2015-18. The use of unpublished archival resources is highlighted in revealing
a detailed and localised picture of events in New South Wales during 1816. The
rediscovery and reinterpretation of the facts behind this historic episode reveals
the ever-evolving history of Australia and the moving stories which are an
important part of that history.
The War of 1816
On 9 April 1816 Governor Lachlan
Macquarie, supreme representative of the Crown in the Australian colonies and Commander-in-chief of the local military forces, with power and authority over all lands and peoples,
declared war on the Aboriginal nations of New South Wales. The declaration was
never explicitly stated or announced publically, and the official histories do
not record it. However the reality was clear from the secret orders issued to military regiments under his command and from Macquarie’s public
proclamation of 4 May outlining punitive actions to be taken against the
Aboriginal population.
The fact that it was war was revealed when Macquarie announced that all Aboriginal people within the environs of Sydney who were encountered by the military were to be captured as “prisoners of war.” The words were clear, as was the intent. In 1814 he spoke of taking Aborigines “prisoners”, however by 1816 his words had hardened to “prisoners of war.” Macquarie now sought “to inflict terrible and exemplary punishments” upon what he referred to as “hostile tribes” and his actions were commensurate with this aim.
The fact that it was war was revealed when Macquarie announced that all Aboriginal people within the environs of Sydney who were encountered by the military were to be captured as “prisoners of war.” The words were clear, as was the intent. In 1814 he spoke of taking Aborigines “prisoners”, however by 1816 his words had hardened to “prisoners of war.” Macquarie now sought “to inflict terrible and exemplary punishments” upon what he referred to as “hostile tribes” and his actions were commensurate with this aim.
Published and unpublished
official records outline in detail the events of 1816. In summary, Macquarie’s
regiments were ordered to pursue and fire upon any Aboriginal people who attempted
to escape apprehension as the soldiers scoured the settled and unsettled areas
about Sydney. The governor declared that Aboriginal men shot and killed during
such encounters were to be hung from trees in prominent positions, to strike
fear and terror amongst the surviving Aboriginal population. For example, in
his instructions to Captain Schaw of the 46th Regiment, Macquarie
stated:
“On any occasion of seeing or
falling in with the Natives, either in bodies or singly, they are to be called
on, by your friendly Native Guides, to surrender themselves to you as Prisoners
of War. If they refuse to do so, make the least show of resistance, or attempt
to run away from you, you will fire upon and compell them to surrender, breaking
and destroying the spears, clubs, and waddies of all those you take Prisoners. Such
Natives as happen to be killed on such occasions, if grown up men, are to be
hanged up on trees in conspicuous situations, to strike the Survivors with the
greater terror. On all occasions of your being obliged to have recourse to
offensive and coercive measures, you will use every possible precaution to save
the lives of the Native Women and Children, but taking as many of them as you
can Prisoners.”
The bodies of slain warriors were
also decapitated, though in secret, and their heads sent off to museums in
Europe. Camps were created to house those people captured, whilst prisoners
were transported to penal establishments such as Port Arthur and children were
taken from families and tribes for re-education. Gatherings of six or more
Aborigines were declared illegal, customary practice was outlawed, as was the
carrying of spears, and the non-Aboriginal civilian population was granted
permission to shoot and kill those Aborigines who did not adhere to the tenets
of the various proclamations issued by government.
The campaign – or “service” as Macquarie called it - was to be executed with “secrecy and despatch” (Organ 1989). This brutal and barbaric action on the part of the authorities was also to make it clear to the rest of the population that the Aboriginal people were to be treated in a manner which would ensure the security of the ever expanding settlement.
The campaign – or “service” as Macquarie called it - was to be executed with “secrecy and despatch” (Organ 1989). This brutal and barbaric action on the part of the authorities was also to make it clear to the rest of the population that the Aboriginal people were to be treated in a manner which would ensure the security of the ever expanding settlement.
On 18 March 1816 Macquarie had
written to his superior in England, Earl Bathurst, noting his previous
unsuccessful efforts “to domesticate and civilise these wild rude people”, revealing
an arrogant, condescending attitude towards the local Aborigines which is a
clear indication of his failure to understand the inherent differences between
the two civilisations. Macquarie’s efforts at assimilation of Aboriginal
society into the British way of life failed, as they have ever done.
In the absence of a formal
statement, Macquarie’s secret orders of 9 April were a de facto declaration of
war by the Crown against the Aboriginal population of New South Wales. The
subsequent proclamation of 4 May was tantamount to an official rejection of the
traditional Aboriginal way of life, and of the local law and custom. Macquarie
was either totally oblivious to the significance of his actions or, more likely,
chose simply to ignore it.
On 8 May he reported to Earl
Bathurst on the military elements of the campaign, noting that “in consequence of the hostile and sanguinary dispositions manifested
for a considerable time past by the Aborigines of this Country, I had
determined to send out some military detachments into the interior, either to
apprehend or destroy them …..
giving
them instructions to make as many prisoners as possible; this service occupied
a period of 23 days.”
On 20 July the governor issued
another proclamation declaring ten Aboriginal warriors outlaws. Therein he
stated in the harshest possible terms that members of the public were granted
“the power to kill and utterly destroy them,” and receive a reward of £10 for
each for doing so. This was evidence of a further hardening of Macquarie’s
attitude and expansion of the punitive actions. Needless to say, the British
were successful in killing, capturing and terrorising the local Aboriginal
population.
On 1 November Macquarie brought
the campaign to an end, issuing a proclamation which stated, in part, that “from
and after the 8 November 1816, all hostile operations, military or other,
against the said native tribes will cease.” This could be said to officially mark
the end of the war. It had begun in April, with the instructions to the
military “to make Prisoners of all the Natives of both sexes whom you may see
or fall in with on your route after you march from Sydney, and carry them with
you to be lodged in places of security at Parramatta and Windsor respectively,
until after the present Service is over.”
By 4 April 1817 Macquarie was
able to report to Earl Bathurst “that
all hostility on both sides has since ceased.” He commented therein on the success of the military campaign,
though omitted its more barbaric and brutal elements, including the massacre at
Appin on 17 April 1816 of a tribe comprising 15 men, women and children,
carried out by soldiers under cover of darkness (McGill 2013). No accounts
survive by Aboriginal people of their view of the campaign, and none was sought
by the English at the time.
Macquarie’s war of 1816 was not
an isolated event, but a continuation of the unofficial war which had existed
in Australia since the arrival of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove in January
1788.
War, commemoration
and the vagaries of history
“…the then unsettled
… Great South Land.” (Tony Abbott, 2014)
Macquarie’s war of 1816 entailed
secrecy and expediency so as not to alert the indigenous population to the
actions which were carried out by the local military forces and civilian
population. Macquarie’s reference to “prisoners of war” in his orders of 9
April is telling. A prisoner of war is, by definition, any person captured or
interned by a belligerent power during war. But what is war? How do we define
it, both as it occurs and in retrospect? What is our attitude towards
commemorating war, and what should be included in those commemorations, or
omitted? In light of the ANZAC centenary celebrations of 2015 these questions
have increased relevance.
It can be argued that Australia,
like many countries, has failed to address these issues in a manner which is
consistent with the facts of history. It may seem a simple, straightforward
task to talk about, and to identify, the wars in which Australia has been
involved, but such is not the case. This is due to a variety of factors,
including the precise definition of war, the circumstances surrounding the
specific events of that conflict, and the political climate at any given time.
In the case of Governor Macquarie during 1816 he felt the need to keep his
punitive actions secret, due in part to their severe nature and the likelihood
that the community at large, and the authorities back in England, could take
exception to them, either in whole or part.
In 1989 I published a book
entitled Illawarra and South Coast Aborigines 1770-1850 which included a
section on the punitive military campaigns of 1816. The book was intended as a
reference tool and resource for further studies in the wake of the Australian
Bicentennial celebrations of 1988. Whilst including brief introductory texts to
chapters, the content was largely left to speak for itself. It revealed that a
large part of Illawarra’s history had been ignored. Many “facts” remained
buried, especially those that sections of the community deemed unsavoury in
connection with the local Aboriginal population. These sections were excluded
from more general accounts and school curricular, with the result that what we
believed and had been told about the early history of Australia and our local
area up to that time was, in many instances, wrong. Table 1 summaries some of
the common misconceptions about Australian history and the use of English
language to mask the true nature of actions carried out against the Aboriginal
population from the time of Captain Cook.
Table 1: Terminologies
British
|
Reality
|
Comments
|
Terra nullius
|
Settled land, occupied by Aboriginal
tribes and family groups who claimed ownership (sovereignty)
|
Aboriginal individuals and tribes had
complex connections with specific parcels of land. Traditional ownership was
practised. This was totally ignored and denied by the British who acted as if
the land was unoccupied.
|
Conflict
|
War
|
By any definition, the actions of the
British authorities from 1788 was a war against the local Aboriginal people.
It involved military campaigns and the taking of prisoners of war. The
British referred only to conflict and retaliatory actions in defence of
settlers.
|
Settlement
|
Theft of land, no compensation
|
No treaty was ever signed with the
Aboriginal people of Australia by the British colonisers, because they did
not recognise their existence or rights in law.
|
Guns
|
Spears
|
Aboriginal people were shot, killed and
wounded with little or no medical treatment offered following such encounters.
|
Mission
|
Concentration camp
|
Instigated by Governor Lachlan
Macquarie as part of his war of 1816. The missions were in fact a form of
concentration camp, breaking up families and traditional tribal groups and
separating people from traditional lands.
|
Sovereignty
|
Native Title
|
The British failed to acknowledge
Aboriginal rights to the land, ownership and sovereignty.
|
Primitive
|
Civilisation
|
The British denigrated Aboriginal
culture, history and society, failing to recognise its complexity, richness
and uniqueness as a civilisation. It referred to, and treated the Aborigines
as primitive and uncivilised, when in fact the actions of the British
authorities and settlers suggested the opposite was the case in many
instances.
|
Natives
|
Warriors
|
Aboriginal men fought as warriors in a
war against the invaders of their land, from the time of Captain Cook.
|
Hostile
|
Defence and retribution
|
The British reacted to Aboriginal
hostility with unwarranted violence. The Aborigines retaliation to
provocation and abuse.
|
Civilised
|
Uncivilised
|
The treatment of the Aboriginal people
by the occupying British was barbaric, horrific and uncivilised. Yet the
British claimed to be the most civilised of nations and to bring civilisation
to countries such as Australia.
|
Godless
|
Gods, spirits, totems, spirituality,
life after death
|
The British largely failed to observe,
recognise or acknowledge the complex religious and spiritual life of the
local Aboriginal people.
|
Peaceful
|
Opposition
“Wirra wirra!” – Go away!
|
The Aborigines were not simply a
peaceful race who accepted the occupation of their land. They rejected the
invasion from the outset and fought back. Cook in 1770 was opposed. Phillip
in 1788 was opposed. The opposition was vehement and continues to the present
day.
|
As an historian who has
researched and written about members of his own family who served in military
forces and went to war, it was easy to see the gaps in the portrayal of
Australia’s historic past. In 1984, for example, I published an account of my ancestor
William Organ (1801-1878) who was a member of the 28th
Gloucestershire Regiment of Foot during the 1830s. He arrived in Australia
during 1835 and served for 5 years throughout New South Wales in charge of
convict stockades and road gangs, alongside his brother Thomas. In 1840 they
settled in Wollongong with their family. In 2013 I carried out research into my
great-uncle Jack Speirs who served on the Western Front during 1916-18. Their
stories are interesting and form part of my family history and the history of
Australia, though I know only a fraction of the truth of their lives. I would
regret it if they were ignored, or their service not honoured, as it should be
for all those who served and fought “for King and Country”, or the equivalent.
But there is a problem. The
British were a colonising power, and the First Nations of this land never ceded
their claim to sovereignty, even though the existence of any such sovereignty on
the part of the indigenous population was denied by the Crown throughout the
colonial period. It was convenient to do so, and they had the military might to
put down any opposition. If the colonisers rightly treated the Aboriginal
people of Australia as equals, and allocated to them equal rights and
privileges under the law and in everyday life, then the picture of Australia’s
history would change significantly, as would official accounts. The same honour
that is, for example, applied to the ANZACs and to those who served in wars on
behalf of Australia would apply to the Aboriginal people who fought against the
European invasion of 1788 and opposed the imposition of Terra Nullius through
dispossession. It can be argued that they fought in a noble struggle for their
Country, in a war which was meaningfully forgotten by the victors.
A forgotten war
There is no Australian Aboriginal
war officially recognised or commemorated by the nation at large, or by the
institution tasked with that duty, the Australian War Memorial (Stanley 2014).
This omission of an inconvenient truth has been highlighted in recent years by
the Aboriginal community, academics, military historians and sections of the
wider community. The calls for redress have increased in the lead-up to the
ANZAC and World War I centenary celebrations of 2015-18 (Daly 2013, Reynolds
2013). Yet there was a war, and it began with the initial encounters between
Europeans and the indigenous inhabitants of Australia.
The scene was set for the
conflict to come with the first recorded words spoken by Aborigines to
Europeans, at Botany Bay on Sunday, 29 April 1770, when Captain James Cook and
his party attempted to land from the barque Endeavour.
The shout went out from the local Aborigines “Wirra, Wirra, wai” [Go away!”]. According
to Cook, two Aboriginal warriors “resolved to oppose our landing.” He responded
with musket fire to the spears and stones thrown at his party. The fate of the
man shot is unclear, though he may have been the first fatality in the war against
the invaders. Cook wrote in his log the following day that "all they
seem'd to want was us to be gone."
In 1788 Governor Arthur Phillip
and his military regiments occupied Terra
Nullius (“land belonging to no one”), arriving in Australia with a fleet
comprising convicts, military personnel and free settlers. As Phillip and his
flotilla sailed into Sydney harbour on 23 January the shore was lined with
people shouting, once again, “Wirra, Wirra!” (Collins 1798, Standfield 2010).
The invasion began with the Crown
providing no recognition of indigenous law, language or custom by way of treaty
or reparation (Australian Law Reform Commission 1986). The invasion was an act
of war, though there would never be a formal declaration.
Since the Bicentennial of 1988
there has been a great deal of discussion around this topic, usually under
headings such as the History Wars, Black Arm Band History and Frontier Wars.
The lead commentator in many of these discussions has been Professor Henry
Reynolds, with other historians such as Professor Geoffrey Blayney and Keith
Windshuttle joining the debate. The Aboriginal community has been vociferous
since 1788 in raising their concerns about alienation of land, mistreatment and
the devastating results of the occupation. The actions of Governor Lachlan
Macquarie during 1816 are especially relevant in revealing the extent to which
the British engaged in a war against the Australian Aborigines, using secrecy
and superior military force to ensure victory.
Declaration of War
One issue that has flared in
recent times and caused much debate is the refusal of the Australian War
Memorial (AWM) to accept responsibility for telling the story of encounters
between colonial military forces and the local Aboriginal population. The AWM
maintains that it is the role of the Australian Museum to cover that part of
Australia’s history, though the inappropriateness of such a task is obvious.
The Returned and Services League of Australia (RSL) has gone further and stated
that the AWM only exists to tell the story of Australian military forces
involved in external (overseas) conflicts. A similar stance is taken in New
Zealand in regards to its official war memorial. In both countries the Aboriginal
and Maori communities call for recognition of local (internal) wars, and the
general public remain confused over the arguments put by both sides.
One of the core elements of the
issue with the AWM is the definition of war, and the fact that war was never
officially declared in Australia at any time during the colonial period. As a
result, the AWM argues it has no obligation to preserve and present accounts of
the conflicts during that time. Government follows suite, not interested in
opening up an issue which is known to cause division amongst the electorate.
Senior staff at the AWM and members of the governing committee, including the
former Howard government minister Brendon Nelson, put forward a number of
arguments as to why the AWM does not commemorate internal conflict such as the
Australian Aboriginal War, usually citing the terms of the Australian War
Memorial Act 1980. The Act remains, in fact, vague as to what the role of the
AWM is and one reading allows for inclusion of war-like actions within
Australia during the colonial period by military forces, whether they be local
or British.
Many commentators defend the
refusal to accept that there was any sort of war between the colonial
authorities and the local Aboriginal population, even baulking at use of the
term invasion in reference to the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788. The
question nevertheless remains: if the actions carried out by the colonial
authorities on behalf of the Crown against the local Aboriginal population did
not not comprise war, then what were they?
Armed and unarmed conflict
occurred; thousands of Aboriginal people died, as did a lesser number on the
side of the non-Aboriginal population; and military forces – both British and
local - were involved in campaigns and engagements at the behest of government.
Many commentators have failed to look with any precision into the circumstances
of the various conflicts which took place in Australia during the colonial
period. They do not see an act of war in, for example, the campaigns against
the Tasmanian Aborigines during the 1830s, nor in Macquarie’s punitive actions
during 1816.
Governor Macquarie – governor of
New South Wales between 1 January 1810 and 30 November 1821 – did not have the
power to officially declare war. A declaration of war is, by definition,
between two or more nation states as, for example, when Great Britain and
France declared war with Germany on 3 September 1939. Furthermore, Australia
was a British colony and therefore could not declare war upon itself. To argue
that there was no war because none was officially declared is therefore a moot
point, for war can exist without a formal declaration. This, in fact, was what
usually took place.
John Frederick Maurice, in his classic
study Hostilities without Declaration of War (1883), showed that between
1700 and 1870 in Europe and the United States war was officially declared only
ten times and waged 107 times without declaration. During the eighteenth
century Great Britain declared war on France, Spain and the Dutch Republic five
times, and only once in the nineteenth century, during 1854 and against Russia.
Evan for the Zulu War of 1879 there was no official declaration, but simply an
ultimatum by a colonial official. There was therefore no precedent for a
colonial governor to declare war on a native population of a British colony,
whether it be Arthur Phillip or Lachlan Macquarie. Such a declaration in
regards to Australia would have entailed the Crown declaring war upon itself,
for the British had taken possession in January 1788. It remained a colony
until 1901 and the formation of the Commonwealth of Australia. Up to that point
the power to declare war was vested in the Crown, and thereafter with the
Commonwealth. Debate continues to rage to this day as to who has the privilege of
declaring war on behalf of Australia – the Prime Minister, the Parliament or
the people? In light of such ambiguity, often no official declarations are
made. Therefore, with no power to declare war, and no likelihood of the British
authorities in the form of the Crown issuing a declaration of war, Governor
Macquarie in 1816 was constrained in regards to the words he could apply to any
war-like actions he wished to engage in locally. Nevertheless, his intentions
were clear in 1816 and his actions unambiguous.
The Australian Aboriginal War
It can be argued that war existed
between the British and the Australian Aborigines from the time of the arrival
of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove in January 1788 and continued through to the
creation of the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901, though was most intensely
pursued by the British at the frontiers of settlement during the first half
century of colonisation. The Aboriginal people continue to fight for their
rights and recognition of sovereignty.
The fact that this war was
carried out across the continent and into Tasmania is evident by the recent opposition
to the Western Australian Barnett government naming a prominent Perth city
square after Noongar resistance warrior Yagan (Georgatos 2014). Whilst many
view the place naming as an honour, others see it as an insult to a man
murdered in 1833 for opposing the brutality and dispossession that came with
European settlement (Cormick 1997). Yagan was a warrior at war. At the time of
his capture in 1832 local settler Robert Lyon argued for his treatment as a “prisoner
of war” (Green 1984).
War is war, and this was one,
plain and simple. The Australian War Memorial refusal to accept the facts of
history and commemorate the valour of those Aboriginal warriors who fought with
bravery against the invaders is historically indefensible. Its current view
that Aboriginal history and commemoration of the Aboriginal War – like those
expatriated skulls - belongs in a museum, is likewise historically flawed and
inappropriate. It represents a continuation of the colonial period attitude of
Aboriginal people as museum specimens, and Aboriginal culture, society and
history as primitive and uncivilised.
The Australian Aboriginal War is
ignored, and it must be asked: Why? Is it because the colonisers – the victors
- were the enemy, responsible for the atrocities, the massacres, the
dispossession and the death of a significant section of the local indigenous
population? The obvious answer is yes. The Australian War Memorial symbolically
leads the nation in denial, backed by the RSL and government. The media
supports omission or largely ignores the issue. The Aboriginal population
observes Anzac Day and wonder why their own experiences of war during the
colonial period are ignored. They receive no answer. Memorials are erected to
Aboriginal members of the Australian military forces, but the Aboriginal War
remains unmarked (Newbury 2011, Watson 2013, Anonymous 2014). It is time for
Australia to honour the deeds and heroism of this country's first war veterans
- the Aboriginal men, women, and children who fought in the Australian War from
1788. They fought with honour; they fought for the Dreaming, and for family; they
fought for Country; they fought valiantly and died courageously. Just like the
ANZACS, they were Australians fighting for Australia.
References
Anonymous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander War Memorial Unveiled
[webpage], Reconciliation South Australia, 10 November 2013. URL: http://www.reconciliationsa.org.au/.
Accessed 17 June 2014.
Australian Law Reform Commission, Aboriginal Customary Laws and
Anglo-Australian Law After 1788 – Australian Law as Applied to Aborigines, in
Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Law, ALRC Report 31. [Aborigines not
considered British subjects by Macquarie’s proclamation of May 1816. His Port
Regulations and Orders of 1810 specifically point out that they are not His
Majesty’s subjects or foreigners.]
Cormick, Craig, Yagan: an Aboriginal resistance hero, Green Left
Weekly, 10 September 1997.
Davis, Megan, A culture of disrespect: Indigenous peoples and
Australian public institutions, UTS Law Review, 8, 2006, 135-152.
Daly, Peter, Why does the Australian War Memorial ignore the frontier
war?, The Guardian, 12 September 2013.
Georgatos, Gerry, Let Yagan rest in peace, The Stringer, 5 June
2014. Available URL: http://thestringer.com.au/let-yagan-rest-in-peace/.
-----, WA’s Yagan “honour” is seen as an insult by Nyungah community, National
Indigenous Times, 18 June 2014, 13.
Green, Neville, Broken spears: Aborigines and Europeans in the
Southwest of Australia, Perth, 1984.
Griffin, Ben, Ex-British soldier Ben Griffin on why we will not fight
for Queen and country, No Glory in War [website], 2 February 2014. URL: http://noglory.org/. Accessed 17 June 2014.
Jones, Howard, The call was loud to fight and die for king and
country, The Border Mail, 25 April 2014.
Maurice, John Frederick, Hostilities without Declaration of War,
London, 1883.
McGill, Jeff, Should the Appin Massacre be covered at the Australian
War Memorial?, Macarthur Advertiser, 17 September 2013.
Newbury, Paul W., Forgotten Aboriginal war heroes, Eureka Street,
18 April 2011. URL: http://www.eurekastreet.com.au.
Accessed 22 September 2014.
Organ, M.K., Illawarra and South Coast Aborigines 1770-1850,
Aboriginal Education Unit, University of Wollongong, 1989, 620p.
‘Prisoner of War’, Encyclopaedia Britannica [online]. Accessed
14 June 2014.
Reynolds, Henry, Forgotten War, New South Press, 2013.
Smith, Keith Vincent, Confronting Cook, The Electronic British
Library Journal, 2009.
Standfield, Rachel ‘These unoffending people’: myth, history and the
idea of Aboriginal resistance in David Collins’ Account of the English Colony
in New South Wales (1798), in Frances-Peters Little, Ann Curthoys and John
Docker (eds.), Passionate Histories: Myth, Memory and Indigenous Australia,
ANU Press, 2010, 324p.
Stanley, Peter, On Anzac Day, we remember the Great War but forget our
first war, The Conversation, 25 April 2014.
Watson, Callie, Nation’s first Aboriginal war memorial, at Torrens
Parade Ground, unveiled, The Advertiser, Adelaide, 10 November 2013.
Williams, George, Time to fix stain in the constitution, Sydney
Morning Herald, 18 July 2014, 18-19.
Michael Organ
2 December 2014
Michael Organ
2 December 2014